Comparative Analysis of the MPPT Algorithm in a Residence and a Grid-Connected Solar PV System Under Partial Shade Conditions - A Review

Zohar Al Dodaev, Tareq Aziz, Md. Shahriar Rahman, Tamal Ahammed Joy

Abstract


The abstract gives a clear overview of the study's aims, techniques, and conclusions. The authors compare Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) algorithms in two different solar photovoltaic (PV) system setups such as a home system and a grid-connected system, both running in partial shade. The study's goal is to review the performance of various MPPT algorithms in these settings and provide insights into their effectiveness in improving energy extraction from PV panels. The authors evaluate and assess various MPPT approaches and their adaptation to various system settings using tracking efficiency and conversion efficiency. This can be evaluated through algorithmic complexity analysis, hardware implementation considerations, and simulation studies using software tools like MATLAB/Simulink or PSpice. The paper explores the impact of partial shade on solar PV systems and its implications for energy output using a complete evaluation of relevant literature and empirical data. The authors evaluate the feasibility of MPPT algorithms for reducing the negative impacts of partial shading, concentrating on their capacity to track the maximum power point of the panels rapidly and correctly. The review also takes into account system efficiency, response time, and computing complexity. The findings of this study offer valuable insights into the performance of MPPT algorithms in the context of residential and grid-connected solar PV systems operating under partial shade conditions. The authors highlight the strengths and limitations of different MPPT techniques and provide recommendations for selecting appropriate algorithms based on the specific application. The comparative analysis sheds light on the challenges posed by partial shading and underscores the importance of advanced MPPT strategies in improving the overall efficiency and energy yield of solar PV systems. Overall, this paper contributes to the understanding of MPPT algorithms' role in enhancing solar energy utilization in both residential and grid-connected settings, particularly when dealing with partial shade scenarios.

Keywords


MPPT, Integration, Algorithms, Solar System, Electric Grid

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Li, J. Han, “The impact of shadow covering on the rooftop solar photovoltaic system for evaluating self-sufficiency rate in the concept of nearly zero energy building,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 80, p. 103821, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103821.

M. Y. Worku et al., “A Comprehensive Review of Recent Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Systems under Partial Shading,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 11132, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411132.

S. Chtita et al., “A novel hybrid GWO–PSO-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems operating under partial shading conditions,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 10637, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14733-6.

A. K. Devarakonda, N. Karuppiah, T. Selvaraj, P. K. Balachandran, R. Shanmugasundaram, T. Senjyu, “A comparative analysis of maximum power point techniques for solar photovoltaic systems,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 8776, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228776.

Y. Elomari, M. Norouzi, M. Marín-Genescà, A. Fernández, D. Boer, “Integration of Solar Photovoltaic Systems into Power Networks: A Scientific Evolution Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 9249, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159249.

M. Morey, N. Gupta, M. M. Garg, A. Kumar, “A comprehensive review of grid-connected solar photovoltaic system: Architecture, control, and ancillary services,” Renewable Energy Focus, vol. 45, pp. 307-330, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.04.009.

E. Halassa, L. Mazouz, A. Seghiour, A. Chouder, S. Silvestre, “Revolutionizing Photovoltaic Systems: An Innovative Approach to Maximum Power Point Tracking Using Enhanced Dandelion Optimizer in Partial Shading Conditions,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 3617, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093617.

M. Zhang, Z. Miao and L. Fan, “Reduced-Order Analytical Models of Grid-Connected Solar Photovoltaic Systems for Low-Frequency Oscillation Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1662-1671, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2021.3061296.

Y. Jiang, J. Xu, X. Leng, N. Eghbalian, “A novel hybrid maximum power point tracking method based on improving the effectiveness of different configuration partial shadow,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 50, p. 101835, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101835.

Z. H. Hadi, M. Aljanabi, B. J. Hamza, A. Y. Taha, “Conventional and intelligent maximum power point tracking strategies for mitigating shading issues of photovoltaic systems: A comprehensive review,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2776, no. 1, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0136726.

H. Wang et al., “Power performance improvement in sediment microbial fuel cells: Recent advances and future challenges,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 63, pp. 24426-24446, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.291.

T. Anjum, J. K. Nayak and A. Ghosh, “A Comparative Analysis between Perturb & Observe and Incremental Conductance techniques for MPPT in PV System,” 2022 IEEE 10th Power India International Conference (PIICON), pp. 1-6, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/PIICON56320.2022.10045113.

S. Intriago, P. Robayo, J. Llanos, F. Silva and J. Gómez, “Comparison of Control Strategies for Monitoring the Maximum Power Point Tracking of a Photovoltaic Plant,” 2022 IEEE Sixth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), pp. 1-6, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM56276.2022.9935710.

T. Atyia, M. Qasim, “Evaluating the Impact of Weather Conditions on the Effectiveness and Performance of PV Solar Systems and Inverters,” NTU Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34-46, 2023, https://doi.org/10.56286/ntujre.v5i1.551.

I. Pervez, C. Antoniadis, Y. Massoud, “Advanced Limited Search Strategy for Enhancing the Performance of MPPT Algorithms,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 5650, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15155650.

T. E. K. Zidane et al., “Grid-Connected Solar PV Power Plants Optimization: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 79588-79608, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3299815.

M. L. Katche, A. B. Makokha, S. O. Zachary, M. S. Adaramola, “A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking (mppt) techniques used in solar pv systems,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 2206, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052206.

F. A. Omar, N. Pamuk, A. A. Kulaksiz, “A critical evaluation of maximum power point tracking techniques for PV systems working under partial shading conditions,” Turkish Journal of Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73-81, 2023, https://doi.org/10.31127/tuje.1032674.

D. Sharma, M. F. Jalil, M. S. Ansari, R. C. Bansal, “A review of PV array reconfiguration techniques for maximum power extraction under partial shading conditions,” Optik, vol. 275, p. 170559, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170559.

A. K. Devarakonda, N. Karuppiah, T. Selvaraj, P. K. Balachandran, R. Shanmugasundaram, T. Senjyu, “A comparative analysis of maximum power point techniques for solar photovoltaic systems,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 22, p. 8776, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228776.

S. Dorel, M. G. Osman, C. Strejoiu, G. Lazaroiu, “Exploring Optimal Charging Strategies for off-Grid Solar PV Systems: A Comparative Study on Battery Storage Techniques,” Batteries, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 470, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9090470.

E. Faizal, Y. A. Winoko, M. S. Mustapa, M. Kozin, “Solar Charger Controller Efficiency Analysis of Type Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) and Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT),” Asian Journal Science and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90-102, 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.51278/ajse.v1i2.546.

M. Kumar, K. P. Panda, J. C. Rosas-Caro, A. Valderrabano-Gonzalez and G. Panda, “Comprehensive Review of Conventional and Emerging Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Uniformly and Partially Shaded Solar Photovoltaic Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 31778-31812, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3262502.

L. P. Fan, Q. P. Chen, Z. Q. Guo, “An Fuzzy improved perturb and observe (P&O) maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for Microbial Fuel Cells,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 221157, 2022, https://doi.org/10.20964/2022.11.49.

U. Chauhan, H. Chhabra, A. Rani, B. Kumar, V. Singh, “Efficient MPPT Controller for Solar PV System Using GWO-CS Optimized Fuzzy Logic Control and Conventional Incremental Conductance Technique,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, vol. 47, pp. 463-472, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-022-00569-3.

A. Hassan, O. Bass, M. A. Masoum, “An improved genetic algorithm based fractional open circuit voltage MPPT for solar PV systems,” Energy Reports, vol. 9, pp. 1535-1548, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.12.088.

R. Guntupalli, M. Sudhakaran, “Modeling & implementation of DRLA based partially shaded solar system integration with 3-ϕ conventional grid using constant current controller,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 6, p. E09669, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09669.

D. Sibtain, M. M. Gulzar, K. Shahid, I. Javed, S. Murawwat, M. M. Hussain, “Stability analysis and design of variable step-size P&O algorithm based on fuzzy robust tracking of MPPT for standalone/grid connected power system,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 15, p. 8986, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14158986.

F. Yahiaoui et al., “An experimental testing of optimized fuzzy logic-based MPPT for a standalone PV system using genetic algorithms,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4176997.

M. Bouzidi, H. Abdelkader, S. Mansouri, V. Dumbrava, “Modeling of a Photovoltaic Array with Maximum Power Point Tracking Using Neural Networks,” Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 905, pp. 53-64, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4028/p-ndl3bi.

M. H. Ibrahim, S. P. Ang, M. N. Dani, M. I. Rahman, R. Petra and S. M. Sulthan, “Optimizing Step-Size of Perturb & Observe and Incremental Conductance MPPT Techniques Using PSO for Grid-Tied PV System,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 13079-13090, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3242979.

S. Danyali et al., “A New Model Predictive Control Method for Buck-Boost Inverter-Based Photovoltaic Systems,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 18, p. 11731, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811731.

I. Dagal, B. Akın, E. Akboy, “MPPT mechanism based on novel hybrid particle swarm optimization and salp swarm optimization algorithm for battery charging through simulink,” Scientific reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2664, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06609-6.

R. H. Mohammed, A. A. Abdulrazzaq, W. K. Al-Azzawi, “Benefits of MPP tracking PV system using perturb and observe technique with boost converter,” International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2468-2477, 2022, http://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v13.i4.pp2468-2477.

V. F. Gruner et al., “Modified Current Sensorless Incremental Conductance Algorithm for Photovoltaic Systems,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 790, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16020790.

S. Pant and R. P. Saini, “Comparative Study of MPPT Techniques for Solar Photovoltaic System,” 2019 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON), pp. 1-6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/UPCON47278.2019.8980004.

M. Ahmed, I. Harbi, C. M. Hackl, R. Kennel, J. Rodriguez, M. Abdelrahem, “Maximum power point tracking‐based model predictive control with reduced sensor count for PV applications,” IET Renewable Power Generation, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12535.

J. Morgoš, P. Klčo, K. Hrudkay, “Artificial Neural Network Based MPPT Algorithm for Modern Household with Electric Vehicle,” Communications-Scientific letters of the University of Zilina, vol. 24, no. 1, p. C18-C26, 2022, https://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2022.1.C18-C26.

G. Giurgi, L. A. Szolga, D. Giurgi, “Benefits of fuzzy logic on MPPT and PI controllers in the chain of photovoltaic control systems,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 2318, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12052318.

L. Aleksandr, G. Demidova, O. Alassaf, D. Lukichev, A. Rassõlkin and T. Vaimann, “MPPT Algorithms for Wind Turbines: Review and Comparison,” 2022 29th International Workshop on Electric Drives: Advances in Power Electronics for Electric Drives (IWED), pp. 1-6, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/IWED54598.2022.9722597.

S. Ramesh et al., “Optimization of solar hybrid power generation using conductance-fuzzy dual-mode control method,” International Journal of Photoenergy, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7756261.

P. Rajbhoj, S. Hamde, “Exploration of different maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system,” International Journal of Ambient Energy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 592-615, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2022.2137584.

J. Linares-Flores, A. Hernández-Mendez, J. A. Juárez-Abad, M. A. Contreras-Ordaz, C. García-Rodriguez and J. F. Guerrero-Castellanos, “MPPT Novel Controller Based on Passivity for the PV Solar Panel-Boost Power Converter Combination,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 6436-6444, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2023.3274618.

T. Hai, J. Zhou, K. Muranaka, “An efficient fuzzy-logic based MPPT controller for grid-connected PV systems by farmland fertility optimization algorithm,” Optik, vol. 267, p. 169636, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2022.169636.

V. A. M. Lopez, U. Žindžiūtė, H. Ziar, M. Zeman, O. Isabella, “Study on the Effect of Irradiance Variability on the Efficiency of the Perturb-and-Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 20, p. 7562, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207562.

A. I. M. Ali, H. R. A. Mohamed, “Improved P&O MPPT algorithm with efficient open-circuit voltage estimation for two-stage grid-integrated PV system under realistic solar radiation,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 137, p. 107805, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107805.

X. Feng, T. Ma, “Solar photovoltaic system under partial shading and perspectives on maximum utilization of the shaded land,” International Journal of Green Energy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 378-389, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2047977.

K. Abdulmawjood, S. Alsadi, S. S. Refaat and W. G. Morsi, “Characteristic Study of Solar Photovoltaic Array Under Different Partial Shading Conditions,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 6856-6866, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3142168.

M. M. A. Awan, “A technical review of MPPT algorithms for solar photovoltaic system: SWOT Analysis of MPPT Algorithms,” Sir Syed University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 98-106, 2022, https://doi.org/10.33317/ssurj.433.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.59247/csol.v2i1.91

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Md Rakibur Zaman

 
Control Systems and Optimization Letters
ISSN: 2985-6116
Website: https://ejournal.csol.or.id/index.php/csol
Email: alfian_maarif@ieee.org
Publisher: Peneliti Teknologi Teknik Indonesia
Address: Jl. Empu Sedah No. 12, Pringwulung, Condongcatur, Kec. Depok, Kabupaten Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia